FIDA demands urgent retraining of judges over 'dangerous' divorce ruling
The International Federation of Women Lawyers Ghana (FIDA) has petitioned the Judicial Service of Ghana, calling for urgent retraining of judges following what it describes as a "dangerous" and deeply troubling divorce ruling. The letter, dated April 13, was addressed to Justice Paul Baffoe-Bonnie. The concerns stem from the judgment delivered on January 20, 2026, in the case of Mrs Joana Quaye v. Richard Nii Armah Quaye.
FIDA expressed "complete disapproval" of portions of the judgment, particularly references to the petitioner as "physically… attractive" and "capable of remarrying anytime she felt like," describing such remarks as "offensive and deeply troubling." They also criticised the judge's assertion that "marriage is not an investment" and the characterisation of the petitioner's financial claim as "ridiculous." The group noted references to the respondent's "earning capacity and 'numerous companies,'" alongside an order of GH¢5,000 monthly maintenance for three minor children. FIDA warned that the ruling has already triggered widespread public reaction and anxiety about fairness in the justice system.
FIDA called for "such administrative, educational, or other appropriate measures as may reinforce gender-sensitive adjudication in matrimonial matters." They stressed the need for judicial reasoning to remain grounded in "dignity, fairness, equality, and r..."
Quick Summary
FIDA Ghana has petitioned the Judicial Service over a divorce ruling, raising concerns about the language used. The group hints at a departure from established principles - and a potential impact on public confidence.
Summary - read the full story for complete context.
Image: MyJoyOnline
GhanaFront aggregates news from trusted sources. Click to read the original article.
Keywords
Explore related tagsMore from MyJoyOnline
Related Stories
More from Politics
TUC welcomes ICJ ruling affirming workers' right to strike
The TUC welcomes a recent ICJ opinion - but will this ruling change how employers and governments treat workers?
6d ago•4 min read
